Musk asked for complex information about how the web-based entertainment stage checks for spam accounts, accusing Twitter of misleading him about misleading records and a number of bot information, and tried to pull himself out of the $44 billion deal.
The company misled Elon Musk and experts about the actual number of spam or bot accounts at the microblogging stage when he made his $44 billion proposal to Twitter in July.
Musk assured him in a letter in July that the organization's inability to prove the number of bots and spam under its control was the motivation for withdrawing the contract.
Twitter responded that his attempts to get out of his grasp are "ineffective and spiteful."
Musk asked former Twitter security chief and whistleblower he asked Peiter Zatko.
Prominent programmer "Mudge" Zatko said in an allegation released last week that organizations are skewing their security efforts, giving customers more development opportunities than spam removal. increase.
Mr. Zatko's subpoena comes ahead of his five-day preliminary hearing in Delaware
Chancery Court, which is scheduled to begin on October 17. Tycoon Musk has long assured that he could get out of the $44 billion exchange because the organization he was trying to acquire underestimated fake and spam accounts. The withdrawal will lead to significant legal discussions in October.
According to a letter distributed on Tuesday, additional data shows that Twitter has "substantially resisted" its obligations related to its information security and buyer protection rules, and that the company has been forced to shut down hostile entertainers and server farms. This supports his claim that he is exposed to hostile actors and data centre outages.
